Epstein Victims Slam FBI for Protecting the Powerful, Say Justice Still Denied

The fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal continues, and now his victims are turning their anger toward the federal agencies they say failed them yet again.

Epstein survivors are publicly blasting the FBI and Department of Justice for what they claim is a continued effort to protect high-powered individuals rather than pursue real accountability. Two victims recently filed letters in federal court demanding independent oversight of the redactions made in newly released documents, alleging the government removed names to shield “wealthy men” connected to Epstein’s trafficking operation.

“I am not a pawn,” one survivor said in her statement, accusing the DOJ of putting the privacy of billionaires ahead of the public’s right to know. Survivors are pushing back against the decision to shut down further document releases, calling it an insult to the years they’ve spent seeking justice.

Danielle Bensky, one of the more vocal survivors, called the Trump administration’s decision to halt the release of Epstein-related files “worse than silencing.” She said it effectively rewrites the history of abuse and allows those connected to Epstein’s crimes to walk away untouched.

And the anger isn’t new. Maria Farmer, one of the first women to report Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell back in 1996, has long accused the FBI of ignoring early abuse reports. Her civil suit outlines a troubling timeline of warnings that federal officials allegedly brushed off.

The frustration among survivors also stems from a 2024 lawsuit filed by 12 victims who say the FBI had enough evidence to act years earlier but failed to protect them. They’re demanding transparency and access to grand jury records, flight logs, and financial ties between Epstein and his elite associates.

The DOJ insists it reviewed over 100,000 documents and chose to end public releases to protect victims’ identities and prevent exposing graphic content. But critics argue that the redactions weren’t about protecting victims — they were about shielding the reputations of the powerful.

As survivors continue their legal fight, they’re also waging a public one. They’re asking the same question many are thinking: Who exactly is the government protecting?

This isn’t just about Epstein anymore. It’s about a system that too often chooses the rich over the right thing to do.