​ Supreme Court Backs Trump in $783M NIH Research Cuts Over DEI
  • Home
    • News
    • Entertainment
    • The Baller Alert Show
    • Baller Alert Lists
    • Baller Alert Exclusives
    • Ballerific Music
    • That’s Baller
    • Fashion
    • Metaverse
    • Tech
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    • Op-Ed
    • Travel
    • Health
  • EVENTS
  • Videos
  • Shop
  • ChatBot
  • About
  • Political News
  • en español
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • News
    • Entertainment
    • The Baller Alert Show
    • Baller Alert Lists
    • Baller Alert Exclusives
    • Ballerific Music
    • That’s Baller
    • Fashion
    • Metaverse
    • Tech
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    • Op-Ed
    • Travel
    • Health
  • EVENTS
  • Videos
  • Shop
  • ChatBot
  • About
  • Political News
  • en español
No Result
View All Result
Baller Alert
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Slash NIH Funding in Major Blow to DEI Efforts

Justices split 5-4 on whether the Trump administration can pull nearly $800 million from health research grants.

poligirlsayswhat by poligirlsayswhat
August 23, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Trump-Ordered Cuts End 383 Health Institute Trials, Leaving Over 74,000 Participants Without Answers or Treatment

NIH Building

The Supreme Court handed Trump another major legal victory this week, clearing the path for his administration to slash hundreds of millions in scientific research funding tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

In a narrow 5-4 ruling, the Court lifted a lower judge’s order that had blocked $783 million worth of cuts at the National Institutes of Health. That means Trump officials can now cancel ongoing grants they argue promote DEI agendas.

Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the Court’s three liberal justices in trying to stop the cuts, but it wasn’t enough. Justice Amy Coney Barrett cast a pivotal vote to keep Trump’s broader anti-DEI directive frozen for future projects, so the administration can’t expand the cuts beyond existing grants — at least for now.

The case centers on a larger $12 billion pool of NIH research projects targeted by the administration. Sixteen Democratic attorneys general and several public health groups sued, arguing that defunding projects midway not only wastes data already collected but also derails careers and slows down breakthroughs in medicine.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson penned a blistering dissent, warning that the Court’s handling of Trump’s emergency appeals basically guarantees him wins. Comparing the Court’s moves to “Calvinball,” the anything-goes game from the Calvin and Hobbes comics, she accused her colleagues of rewriting rules in Trump’s favor.

Meanwhile, Trump’s legal team insists the funding cuts are within his authority and argue that DEI initiatives disguise racial discrimination. Solicitor General D. John Sauer even pushed for dozens of other cases blocking Trump’s funding rollbacks to be thrown out, with Justice Neil Gorsuch criticizing lower courts for standing in the way.

For now, the ruling means hundreds of research programs across the country — many focused on public health and medical science — are on the chopping block.

Previous Post

Boston Richey Beats Two Federal Charges, Faces Retrial on Marijuana Case

Next Post

Missy Elliott Puts 7-Year Songwriting Lawsuit to Rest Over ’90s Sista Album

poligirlsayswhat

poligirlsayswhat

Grace McNair, known by her pen name poligirlsayswhat, is a political journalist and contributor for Baller Alert covering the intersection of politics, culture, and social impact. Her work focuses on breaking down complex policy, elections, and major headlines into clear, accessible insights that connect national decisions to everyday life. With a focus on accountability, media literacy, and the real-world impact of political power, she brings a culturally aware perspective to stories that shape public discourse, particularly within underrepresented communities. Her reporting and commentary center on transparency, truth, and the influence of government decisions on daily life. Following increased public attention and threats tied to her coverage of the administration, she has chosen to maintain a lower public profile while continuing her work. Despite this, her voice remains a consistent and trusted source of insight for readers seeking clarity in an increasingly complex political landscape.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download Baller Alert App

Chat with Baller Alert Bot
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • News
    • Entertainment
    • The Baller Alert Show
    • Baller Alert Lists
    • Baller Alert Exclusives
    • Ballerific Music
    • That’s Baller
    • Fashion
    • Metaverse
    • Tech
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    • Op-Ed
    • Travel
    • Health
  • EVENTS
  • Videos
  • Shop
  • ChatBot
  • About
  • Political News
  • en español