The Megan Thee Stallion Miami court testimony is gaining attention as she pushes back against Milagro Gramz’s aggressive legal tactics.
Megan Thee Stallion filed the lawsuit accusing Gramz of spreading false information about the Tory Lanez case and creating targeted harassment campaigns online. According to Megan, the claims were made maliciously and amplified by Lanez’s supporters.
A report from Local 10 says Gramz’s legal team engaged in a tense and persistent cross-examination as they attempted to chip away at Megan’s credibility. The Houston rapper stayed calm but firm while answering questions about past statements and online narratives.
The defense focused heavily on whether Megan had ever been untruthful, even in situations unrelated to the Lanez shooting, hoping to use those moments to discredit her overall reliability.
During questioning, Megan acknowledged she wasn’t fully transparent in certain past personal matters but emphasized that she told the full truth during all criminal proceedings involving Tory Lanez.
Her response allowed Gramz’s team to suggest she misled the public. However, the courtroom report did not detail the exact exchanges that led the defense to that conclusion.
As the trial nears its conclusion, both sides appear locked into credibility battles. Legal experts say these moments could influence how the judge interprets intent, defamation, and the lingering impact of the Tory Lanez trial fallout.
For related coverage, Baller Alert recently reported on major updates surrounding the Tory Lanez trial.
