The lawyers’ guild folded. On Friday, the American Bar Association Council that controls law school accreditation voted to repeal Standard 206, the decades old rule that required every ABA accredited law school to show a real commitment to diversity in recruitment, admissions, and student programming. The rule that quietly forced hundreds of law schools to actually try when it came to recruiting Black, Latino, Asian American, Indigenous, and women students is on its way out the door.
Standard 206 wasn’t a vibes rule. It was the rule. It was the lever that made diversity work non optional inside legal education. If a law school wanted to keep its ABA accreditation, and therefore wanted its graduates to qualify for the bar in most states, it had to demonstrate measurable effort toward building a more representative student body, faculty, and pipeline. For a generation, that single standard quietly funded fellowship programs, pre law outreach, scholarship strategies, and the hiring of Black professors who shouldn’t have needed a federal nudge to get through the door, but did.
The rule has been frozen since February 2025, when the ABA quietly hit pause as soon as Donald Trump returned to the White House and federal pressure on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs kicked into a higher gear. In April 2025, Trump signed an executive order pointing Education Secretary Linda McMahon at the ABA itself, asking her to look into whether the organization should even be allowed to keep its status as the federally recognized accreditor for law schools. The order specifically cited the ABA’s diversity requirements as the problem. That moved the conversation from “should we tweak this rule” to “do we still exist as an accreditor at all.”
By spring 2026, the choice was made. The Department of Education had already sent warning letters to other accrediting bodies making clear that any application of racial diversity standards would be treated as a violation of federal law. The ABA’s own Standards Committee circulated an internal memo telling the council, in plain English, that the entire role of the ABA as an accreditor would be imminently threatened if Standard 206 was not fully repealed rather than just paused. So the council did the math and chose self preservation.
The internal contortion was loud in the room. Council member David Brennen, a former dean at the University of Kentucky College of Law, told the meeting he personally agreed with what the diversity standard was trying to do, but voted to kill it anyway because he didn’t want the ABA restricting the diversity of legal education environments. Translation: I believe in this rule, I’m just not willing to lose our federal seat at the table over it. Retired Colorado Supreme Court Justice Melissa Hart, the council’s incoming chair, framed the vote as a question about the obligations of an accreditor, not a measure of anybody’s personal commitment to diversity. Council Chair Daniel Thies described the move as part of a broader effort to streamline the minimum requirements for law schools, which is corporate speak for we just cut something important and we don’t want you to feel it.
The receipts on the public response are blunt. The ABA opened a notice and comment period that ended in mid April, and the council itself acknowledged that the overwhelming majority of feedback, mostly from legal educators, deans, professors, and students, asked them to keep or strengthen the rule. They repealed it anyway.
Standard 206 is the headline, but it’s not the only target. The same council also voted to open public comment on repealing Standard 303(c), the 2022 rule that requires law schools to teach students about bias, cross cultural competency, and racism before they graduate. They’re also reviewing changes to Standard 205, the non discrimination and equality of opportunity rule for students and faculty, and Standard 207, the reasonable accommodation rule for individuals with disabilities. A decision on those rollbacks could land as soon as August. So in one calendar year, the ABA is potentially gutting four interlocking civil rights inflected standards while telling the public it’s just housekeeping.
The state level moves are happening in parallel and they’re not waiting on the ABA. The state supreme courts of Alabama, Texas, and Florida have already moved to break or limit their reliance on ABA accreditation for bar licensing, and Tennessee and Ohio are reportedly weighing the same move. Most states still require bar applicants to graduate from an ABA accredited law school, which is exactly why the state level defections matter. They strike at the entire monopoly the ABA has held over who gets to practice law in this country. The Department of Education’s reaccreditation hearing for the council itself is set for September.
There is one part of the story the headlines miss. A report from the conservative group Defending Education found that as of April 2026, 72 law schools across 24 states still maintain DEI programs, many of them just rebranded under softer names. Villanova renamed its DEI page Unitas: Community Building. The University of Colorado Boulder went with Community and Culture. American University’s DEI office is now the Office of Inclusive Excellence and Leadership Development. The accreditation requirement may be leaving, but the work didn’t go anywhere. It just got a new logo and a softer caption.
What this vote takes off the table is the floor. For decades, Standard 206 told every law school in America that diversity wasn’t optional, it was the cost of doing business. Without that floor, the future of Black law students depends on whether individual schools decide the work is still worth it, and whether the states they sit in decide to let them do it. The final repeal still has to clear the ABA House of Delegates in August, and the official elimination may not be on the books until 2027. But the direction is set. The rule that built decades of pipeline programs is on its way out, and the rules on racism, bias, non discrimination, and disability accommodation are lined up right behind it.
This current regime is pure evil, with its foundation steeped in white supremency. This all out assault on Blacks and other minorities has been in the planning stage for decades. With the arrival of donald on the scene it was then put into high gear. and now with donald in for a 2nd term magarats are now working overtime to implement their plan of making America the capital of the world for white supremency. especially since they have control of both houses of congress, and donald has now put in place all of his bootlickers who loyalty is stictly to donald. and also donald has the US Supreme court in his pocket who mission is to specially go back and visit all and any cases dealing with civil rights, and the civil rights voting protection to have some maga bring the case back before the court so that they can reverse all cases which give protection to Blacks in every sector of our society. { DEI, REMOVING ALL BLACKS FROM THE MILITRY WHO HAVE A MEDICIAL CONDITION THAT HAVE ZERO EFFECT ON BEING FIT FOR ANY DUTY IN THE MILITARY. IN ADDITION FORCING OUT ALL SENIOR BLACK OFFICERS AND THEN REMOVING ALL bLACKS FROM ALL PROMOTION LIST. ALL WITHOUT ANY PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY, REMOVING ALL BENEFITS FROM EDUCATION, REMOVING ALL PROTECTIONS FROM THE HOUSING SECTOR,} This regime will soon look to find ways ways to deport Blacks who are citizens of this country. The pure hate of racism has now been open again and they now believe that they can return to racist behaviour without any accountability. America is in a very dangerious position we are teetering on becoming a racist fascism nation. All Americans who believe this course of action is wrong must in spite of all the obstabicles being placed in the way to cheat and steal the upcoming midterms must decide they will vote without exception and in historic numbers to begin the process of expelling donald and then his entire administration. This will be a tall order but it must be done to save our nation from these evil doers.