Ava DuVernay is defending her decision to use artificial intelligence in her new documentary, “14th,” after people online called out the filmmaker for using the technology to animate historical photographs of Black Americans.
Video
The criticism began circulating following the film’s October 9 premiere at the New York Film Festival, where viewers noticed that archival images had been digitally animated. Some questioned why DuVernay used AI to make historical figures appear to move when the original photographs could have been presented without alterations.According to The Hollywood Reporter, DuVernay addressed the backlash during AFI Fest on Sunday, October 25, explaining that the technology was used to enhance existing photographs rather than manufacture people or historical events.
Her explanation comes after criticism surfaced across social media, including Reddit, where commenters expressed disappointment with the creative decision.
In an October 10 Reddit discussion, viewers questioned whether the animation added anything meaningful to the documentary. One commenter wrote, “Completely took me out of the film. It’s not even necessary!!!! Just a pointless segment”
Another criticized the execution, writing, “Too much AI, unnecessary effects, reusing same thing same animation at least three times. Good timely subject, terrible execution.”
The criticism extended beyond social media. In an October 12 review published by RogerEbert.com, film critic Jourdain Searles argued that digitally animating photographs of Black Americans from the Reconstruction era distracted from the documentary’s message and raised concerns about respecting the individuals depicted.
DuVernay, however, believes the discussion surrounding AI requires a broader understanding of how filmmaking technology operates.
“The tools that the artists used to do the parallax and the animation in the films have that technology in them, as does Pro Tools with sound, as does Avid with editorial, as does Resolve with color,” she told The Hollywood Reporter.
“I think we’ve come to a place in filmmaking where we have to be really sober about the ways in which that technology is [used] across so much of the workflow.”
She also pushed back against suggestions that the documentary used AI to invent historical material.
“We didn’t use it to fabricate a person or make an avatar of a person or approximate someone’s voice that said something they didn’t say. We actually animated some photos that are in the public domain, and from what we’ve been hearing from people, it does bring people closer to that time in history, which was our goal. So people have to see it and check it out for themselves and make their decisions about how they feel.”
Her defense centers on the difference between animating authentic historical photographs and generating entirely fictional material. However, critics have questioned whether AI should be used to create movements and expressions that were never captured in the original images.
During an earlier New York Film Festival discussion, DuVernay explained to Decider that she drew inspiration from stereoscopic photography, a historical technique that created the illusion of depth. She wanted modern viewers to experience a similar visual effect.
The debate has added controversy to a documentary focused on one of the most consequential constitutional protections in American history.
“14th” examines the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, and its protections surrounding citizenship and equal treatment under the law. The film also investigates contemporary political efforts to challenge those protections.
The project arrives a decade after DuVernay’s acclaimed 2016 documentary “13th,” which explored mass incarceration and racial inequality through the Thirteenth Amendment.
DuVernay said she initially became interested in the new project after “hearing the current president talking about his desire to dismantle birthright citizenship while he was a candidate; he said he would do it in his first week in office. He actually did it in his first day in office; he attacked birthright citizenship.”
“I don’t know much about the 14th Amendment at that point, but I know birthright citizenship is in it. So we start thinking about the possibility of making this film at that point,” she explained.
“Once we saw all of the tentacles of the current administration attacking this amendment, we knew that there was more there. So we investigated it, and that’s what the film became.”
Donald Trump signed an executive order restricting birthright citizenship on January 20, 2025. The Supreme Court struck down that order in June 2026. According to Associated Press reporting, Trump subsequently issued narrower executive actions in August targeting specific citizenship circumstances.
The film features historians, legal experts and political figures, including Stacey Abrams, Sherrilyn Ifill and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, examining the amendment’s lasting impact on American democracy.
While the documentary has already sparked conversation about constitutional rights, its use of AI has created a separate debate about how filmmakers should handle images of Black Americans whose lives were documented generations before the technology existed.
“14th” is scheduled for a limited theatrical release on November 27, 2026, before streaming globally on Netflix on December 4.
